Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µ¦½º¸Þµ¥Åä¹ÌµòÀÇ ÀÓ»ó ¿ë·®ÀÇ ³ªÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯È­

Effect of Age on Optimal Clinical Dose of Dexmedetomidine Sedation

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 14±Ç 3È£ p.151 ~ 155
ÃÖÀ±Áö, ¹éÀç¿ø, ³ë¿µÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÀ±Áö ( Choi Yoon-Ji ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡°ú¸¶Ãë°ú
¹éÀç¿ø ( Baik Jae-Won ) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¸¶ÃëÅëÁõÀÇÇаú
³ë¿µÁø ( Ro Young-JIn ) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¸¶ÃëÅëÁõÀÇÇаú

Abstract


Background: Dexmedetomidine is known to be administered for sedation safely even in a very elderly patient. The purpose
of this study was to determine the effect of age on clinically optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for sedation.

Methods: We enrolled 50 patients ASA class I and II, scheduled for lower extremity surgery that need. They were classified into a young group (n = 26), aged below 75 and an old group (n = 24), aged above 75. Dexmedetomidine was continuously infused 0.5 ¥ìg/kg within 10 min, followed by maintenance at a dose of 0.5 ¥ìg/kg/min, initially. The next dose was selected using the Dixon¡¯s up-and-down method.

Results: The cED50 of dexmedetomidine required to maintain optimal sedation level in young and old group were 0.50 and
0.48 ¥ìg/kg, respectively. With isotonic regression, cED95 of dexmedetomidine was 0.71 ¥ìg/kg (95% confidence intervals 0.57-1.06¥ìg/kg) and 0.58 ¥ìg/kg (95% confidence intervals 0.51-0.67 ¥ìg/kg). There were no significant differences in cED50 (P = 0.21), recovery variables, or incidence of side effects between the two groups.

Conclusions: Clinically optimal dose of dexmedetomidine was not affected to the age during sedation.

Å°¿öµå

Dexmedetomidine; Elderly; Sedation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI